QUESTION 5
Read the incident 8–2 (Implementing
On-the-Job Training), and answer all of the
following questions.
a. What,
if anything, do you think the company should do to keep its young employees?
The company has been remiss
in taking care of its young employees, that’s why most of them leave, feeling
that they are not learning anything new from the company. The idea of assigning them to a senior
auditor is a good one. The only problem there is that their position is merely
just for display purposes and they are not really given any challenging tasks
where they could really sink in their teeth with and show what they are capable
of. With the present set-up, they are
just relegated to run-of-the-mill tasks which are not challenging to them and
therefore bore them. Therefore, what the
company can do to keep these young and talented employees is to allow the
senior auditors to assign some of the more challenging tasks to these young
employees, and then allow the senior auditors to train these young employees,
and basically, include the performance of the young employee as part of the
overall performance of the senior auditor.
That way, the senior auditor will be responsible for the actions and
learnings of the young employee – and the young employee will feel that he or
she is indeed part of the whole process, and not just a flower vase for
decoration in the job they have applied for.
b. Do
you think on-the-job training will work in a situation such as the one
described?
The idea of an on-the-job
training in this case is fine. The only
problem here is the implementation since there is actually no teeth to this
current set-up. Yes, the idea of
apprenticeship is good and works on paper, but the reality is, the senior
auditors are not really guiding the young employees or making them an important
part of the auditing process. The young
employees are just there like some mere decoration, instead of being a real
asset to the company. The company is
actually losing out here since they already have this very talented young
employees in their midst but they are not fully utilizing them, which is really
a waste for both sides – the company and the young employees.
The idea of the on-the-job
training can still be maintained but it can be upgraded into a mentorship
programme where each senior auditor can serve as a mentor for the young
employees. This mentor-apprentice
relationship can then solidify into an important training ground especially for
the young employees – and at the same time, benefit the senior auditors since whatever
the young employees can contribute to the work of the senior auditor is counted
on the performance of the senior auditor.
So it’s a win-win situation for everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment